Ha ha, conspiracy theory eh? Is that the A test or B? Or have both been tampered with? Where is this rumour coming from? Message boards or word of mouth. False flag drugs tests, whatever next?TT Tiger wrote:New twist in the tail. Rumours are circulating the loiners that Hardakers sample was tampered with. I don’t know it what way but that is doing the rounds in Leeds.
Zak - The Truth
Re: Zak - The Truth
Re: Zak - The Truth
Word of mouth the guy was suggesting it may have been tampered with maybe to cover it up.JIN JER wrote:Ha ha, conspiracy theory eh? Is that the A test or B? Or have both been tampered with? Where is this rumour coming from? Message boards or word of mouth. False flag drugs tests, whatever next?TT Tiger wrote:New twist in the tail. Rumours are circulating the loiners that Hardakers sample was tampered with. I don’t know it what way but that is doing the rounds in Leeds.
Re: Zak - The Truth
If you completely forget that he virtually admitted to sniffing coke like a hoover in his statement, I think this has got legs.JIN JER wrote:Ha ha, conspiracy theory eh? Is that the A test or B? Or have both been tampered with? Where is this rumour coming from? Message boards or word of mouth. False flag drugs tests, whatever next?TT Tiger wrote:New twist in the tail. Rumours are circulating the loiners that Hardakers sample was tampered with. I don’t know it what way but that is doing the rounds in Leeds.
removed post it again and you will join them on a 48 hour ban read the AUP
Re: Zak - The Truth
I had to read that twice.WF10 wrote:If you completely forget that he virtually admitted to sniffing coke like a hoover in his statement, I think this has got legs.JIN JER wrote:Ha ha, conspiracy theory eh? Is that the A test or B? Or have both been tampered with? Where is this rumour coming from? Message boards or word of mouth. False flag drugs tests, whatever next?TT Tiger wrote:New twist in the tail. Rumours are circulating the loiners that Hardakers sample was tampered with. I don’t know it what way but that is doing the rounds in Leeds.
Re: Zak - The Truth
I’m saying that Leeds fans are saying someone tried to tamper with the sample to cover it up that’s why it took a month to come out.
Re: Zak - The Truth
So not that he's clean then .....TT Tiger wrote:I’m saying that Leeds fans are saying someone tried to tamper with the sample to cover it up that’s why it took a month to come out.
2yr ban still. Next
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: 08 Jul 2008, 00:20
- Location: On the brink
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
WF10 wrote:If you completely forget that he virtually admitted to sniffing coke like a hoover in his statement, I think this has got legs.JIN JER wrote:Ha ha, conspiracy theory eh? Is that the A test or B? Or have both been tampered with? Where is this rumour coming from? Message boards or word of mouth. False flag drugs tests, whatever next?TT Tiger wrote:New twist in the tail. Rumours are circulating the loiners that Hardakers sample was tampered with. I don’t know it what way but that is doing the rounds in Leeds.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 196
- Joined: 17 Dec 2010, 19:04
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
Get real people if this had been Sam Tomkins you would have wanted him hung by the neck if he has been found positive for a drugs test then he needs to be banned
Re: Zak - The Truth
I go along with being banned if and when he is found guilty, but why the hell after being found to have taken drugs it takes MONTHS before a verdict is given, this is no good for al the party's concerned, I do wish they would get their act together so every one can move on
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 196
- Joined: 17 Dec 2010, 19:04
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
Did he not admit taking drugs by apologising to the club and fans.
Re: Zak - The Truth
Agree with this terrible for a person to be left hanging in the unkown horrible for the club not been able to finalise squads it shouldn’t take more than a couple of weeks to sort it’s damaging to clubs in financial player wise and the player in financial and mental healthgateman wrote:I go along with being banned if and when he is found guilty, but why the hell after being found to have taken drugs it takes MONTHS before a verdict is given, this is no good for al the party's concerned, I do wish they would get their act together so every one can move on
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 09:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
Like the courts showing remorse for a more lenient sentence? I'm only guessing but yes he will be facing a ban and the sooner it's dealt with the better for everyone.devontiger wrote:Did he not admit taking drugs by apologising to the club and fans.
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
he said he'd made an enormous error of judgement. also said he'd never taken performance enhancing drugs.
jo brand is eddie warings love child
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4033
- Joined: 12 Jun 2012, 22:26
- Location: NORMANTON-BUT CLOSER TO CAS THAN WAKEY BAD LANDS
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
hope the ban started when he failed drug test and not month n month down the line
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
You want his ban to be back dated to a date before he stopped playing?onetiger wrote:hope the ban started when he failed drug test and not month n month down the line
Re: Zak - The Truth
This is what gets me he said that and I haven’t ever seen anywhere that says he tested positive for COCAINE? I’m not saying he hasn’t but I haven’t seen anything official saying it yet have I missed something when rangi and walker got banned they said that it was cocaine straight awaylurcher wrote:he said he'd made an enormous error of judgement. also said he'd never taken performance enhancing drugs.
Re: Zak - The Truth
He said he never knowingly taken any performance enhancing drug. So what is he suspended for cos as I've said else when coke hasn't been mentioned like it was reith walker and chase.betts21 wrote:This is what gets me he said that and I haven’t ever seen anywhere that says he tested positive for COCAINE? I’m not saying he hasn’t but I haven’t seen anything official saying it yet have I missed something when rangi and walker got banned they said that it was cocaine straight awaylurcher wrote:he said he'd made an enormous error of judgement. also said he'd never taken performance enhancing drugs.
what doesn't kill me simply makes me...stranger.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 23:34
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
I have read the official statement again very carefully. It could be interpreted that he was tested positive for a performance enhancing drug, but is claiming he had no idea he had done it. Maria Sharapova claimed the same and eventually got her 2 year ban reduced to 15 months.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23102
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Zak - The Truth
What other drug is out there that’s performance enhancing.
If he says he’s never ‘knowingly’ took any, hows it got into his system.
Or is he fibbing.
If he says he’s never ‘knowingly’ took any, hows it got into his system.
Or is he fibbing.
Re: Zak - The Truth
"Finally, I would like to make it clear that in no way did I, nor would I, ever take a substance with the intention of enhancing my performance."
I read it as him saying that he did knowingly take a substance that he didn't think would enhance his performance. ie he took a recreational drug (coke) rather than a known performance enhancing drug (anabolic steroids etc).
I read it as him saying that he did knowingly take a substance that he didn't think would enhance his performance. ie he took a recreational drug (coke) rather than a known performance enhancing drug (anabolic steroids etc).
removed post it again and you will join them on a 48 hour ban read the AUP
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Derbyshiretiger and 70 guests