Zak support
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 13 Aug 2017, 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Lets wait and see before we decide the rights/wrongs.
-
- New member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 05 Oct 2017, 21:06
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
There is no way Powell would have dropped Zak before that game over a broken curfew that happened 3 weeks ago! There were rumours flying weeks ago that he had failed a drugs test! That coupled with what I heard this morning, also coupled with the rfl being involved all points to one thing! That he has infact failed a drugs test
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23239
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Let’s hope he took to much calpol the night before and not a hard core drug.
If it is indeed drug related.
If it is indeed drug related.
-
- New member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 07 Oct 2017, 23:21
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Anyone remember about 20 years ago when Steadman got a small ban. Think it was for cold medicine or something like that. Hence a drug test does not always mean the worst.
-
- New member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 05 Oct 2017, 21:06
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
From what I hear it's sniff and knowing the company he keeps then it really doesn't surprise me! If he wants to hang about with local wannabe/ plastic gangster chavs then this is what will happen. He's not a bad lad at heart but very immature and childish in mentality and unfortunately for us, has cost us alot of money!
Re: Zak support
Nightnurseremotetiger wrote:Anyone remember about 20 years ago when Steadman got a small ban. Think it was for cold medicine or something like that. Hence a drug test does not always mean the worst.
Contained a mild steroid.
Alot more professional and savvy than 20yr ago now with a stronger policing of the supplements allowed
Re: Zak support
Forgive me if this offends anyone, and of course I'm not saying this is HOW it should be, but if someone likes to have a line of Cocaine in their own time;
What has it got to do with anyone else?
This is not a statement it is a question open for debate.
What has it got to do with anyone else?
This is not a statement it is a question open for debate.
Audacter Et Sincere
Re: Zak support
Performance enansing
-
- New member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: 24 Sep 2017, 08:10
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Illegal?Mysterio wrote:Forgive me if this offends anyone, and of course I'm not saying this is HOW it should be, but if someone likes to have a line of Cocaine in their own time;
What has it got to do with anyone else?
This is not a statement it is a question open for debate.
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Cocaine wouldn't get picked up by a drugs test unless it had been taken less than 24 hours before the test.Dez wrote:Performance enansing
It's also only deemed to be 'performance enhancing' if it is detected by an 'in competition' test (in the case of RL, this is deemed to be the date on which a game is played). If cocaine is detected by an 'out of competition' test, it's not deemed as a banned substance and therefore the player will not face a UKAD punishment.
Unfortunately, I would class a Hardaker as stupid enough to take cocaine the night before a game, a la Rangi Chase.
Re: Zak support
That's just it though - I am absolutely certain hardly any player EVER has taken it before or during a game, it's always seemingly in their own time, off the field, during benders or parties.
It's not particularly performance enhancing other than increasing confidence and calming nerves / concentration and could actually make players play worse! It wears off QUICK - there's NO WAY a player could be high on the pitch, unless he openly snorted it before kick off in changing rooms and/or during breaks in play.
There are people on this forum who without doubt will have had it too; and know what I mean.
In terms of performance- it's neither here nor there - players have more than enough stimuli from the game itself and crowd
Why take a players livelihood away for doing something in their own time.
It's not particularly performance enhancing other than increasing confidence and calming nerves / concentration and could actually make players play worse! It wears off QUICK - there's NO WAY a player could be high on the pitch, unless he openly snorted it before kick off in changing rooms and/or during breaks in play.
There are people on this forum who without doubt will have had it too; and know what I mean.
In terms of performance- it's neither here nor there - players have more than enough stimuli from the game itself and crowd
Why take a players livelihood away for doing something in their own time.
Audacter Et Sincere
Re: Zak support
And more to the point - why should anyone be tested for it in the first place?
It's not a steroid for example
I'm only debating this btw! I've felt this for a while...
It's not a steroid for example
I'm only debating this btw! I've felt this for a while...
Audacter Et Sincere
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
It is deemed as performance enhancing if it is taken 'in competition'.Mysterio wrote:And more to the point - why should anyone be tested for it in the first place?
It's not a steroid for example
I'm only debating this btw! I've felt this for a while...
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 09:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Never touched the stuff but would it act has a pain killer? I'm not trying to justify it in way just trying to make sense of it all.Mysterio wrote:That's just it though - I am absolutely certain hardly any player EVER has taken it before or during a game, it's always seemingly in their own time, off the field, during benders or parties.
It's not particularly performance enhancing other than increasing confidence and calming nerves / concentration and could actually make players play worse! It wears off QUICK - there's NO WAY a player could be high on the pitch, unless he openly snorted it before kick off in changing rooms and/or during breaks in play.
There are people on this forum who without doubt will have had it too; and know what I mean.
In terms of performance- it's neither here nor there - players have more than enough stimuli from the game itself and crowd
Why take a players livelihood away for doing something in their own time.
-
- New member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 05 Oct 2017, 21:06
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
24 hours is not correct! Can be upto a week! I personally don't care what he does in his spare time either mysterio!
-
- New member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 05 Oct 2017, 21:06
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Although I do believe as a rugby player he should be leaving that stuff until after the grand final!
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Okay, I was being simplistic. A urine test would detect cocaine between twelve hours and three days, depending on a multitude of factors (mostly how much has been taken!). But the average is 24 hours. If iit's detected after longer than this (using a urine test) then the individual has a serious cocaine problem.Normyford2 wrote:24 hours is not correct! Can be upto a week! I personally don't care what he does in his spare time either mysterio!
It can be detected after a longer period of time through blood testing or hair analysis.
However, most UKAD tests are urine samples.
-
- New member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 05 Oct 2017, 21:06
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
Well we only have a couple of hours to wait and we'll know for sure! I hope what I have been told is complete bs.... otherwise we need a new fullback!nottinghamtiger wrote:Okay, I was being simplistic. A urine test would detect cocaine between twelve hours and three days, depending on a multitude of factors (mostly how much has been taken!). But the average is 24 hours. If iit's detected after longer than this (using a urine test) then the individual has a serious cocaine problem.Normyford2 wrote:24 hours is not correct! Can be upto a week! I personally don't care what he does in his spare time either mysterio!
It can be detected after a longer period of time through blood testing or hair analysis.
However, most UKAD tests are urine samples.
Re: Zak support
IF Zac has failed a drug test for Cocaine I for one never want to see him play for our club again.
Regardless of the performance enhancing/use in personal time debate...it is illegal and unforgivable given his position as a role model for hundreds of children, many of whom carry his name on their club shirts.
Taking drugs in private is one thing, but taking drugs when you are a role model for kids is something entirely different.
Regardless of the performance enhancing/use in personal time debate...it is illegal and unforgivable given his position as a role model for hundreds of children, many of whom carry his name on their club shirts.
Taking drugs in private is one thing, but taking drugs when you are a role model for kids is something entirely different.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 09:17
- Contact:
Re: Zak support
I think it opens up a huge debate after all players are only human and from what I gather it's widespread in the youth of today especially with young men with money,the same has going for 10 pints on a fri/sat when I was that age. Yes it's illegal but it's also an addiction. With a very high portion of players suffering with depression you have to ask some serious question of is this how they get their thrills when they arnt playing. I certainly wouldn't hang him out to dry if he's honest enough to admit he has an addiction. All speculation until some kind of statement is issued.Archibel wrote:IF Zac has failed a drug test for Cocaine I for one never want to see him play for our club again.
Regardless of the performance enhancing/use in personal time debate...it is illegal and unforgivable given his position as a role model for hundreds of children, many of whom carry his name on their club shirts.
Taking drugs in private is one thing, but taking drugs when you are a role model for kids is something entirely different.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 56 guests