Squad for Wakey
Re: Squad for Wakey
Sticks has been superb in the last couple of games and I personally wouldn't drop him but he must have known when he was signed that he wasn't necessarily first choice and it is up to DP to decide who his strongest starting 17 are. If Minikin doesn't go well then Sticks will more than likely be back in.
- the machine
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:21
- Twitter: @dphartshorne
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
Should be other way round, Minikin will get his chance if Clare messes up having made the most of the opportunity presented to him and made it his spot to loseJJ wrote:Sticks has been superb in the last couple of games and I personally wouldn't drop him but he must have known when he was signed that he wasn't necessarily first choice and it is up to DP to decide who his strongest starting 17 are. If Minikin doesn't go well then Sticks will more than likely be back in.
"I can accept failure. Everyone fails at something, but I cannot accept not trying"
Michael Jordan
Michael Jordan
Re: Squad for Wakey
I'm not Minikins biggest fan compared to some people on here but it is Minikins position. Clare knew all along he was just a fill in option. If Minikin comes back at his normal level he will get his spot back.
- Andrew6666
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 16:13
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
Because we have to pick 19 and drop 2. Will is, and should always be one of the 2 based on what we have.Sharlotiger wrote:Is it just a case of Wil getting picked as we don't have any other fit forwards?gateman wrote:Big will keeps being put in the frame, but never gets to play, DP must see somthing in the lad but may be not enough for him to play strange one is that
Can't see him in RL too long, not a dig, just doesn't seem to have anything that makes a decent player for me.
Re: Squad for Wakey
Andrew6666 wrote:Because we have to pick 19 and drop 2. Will is, and should always be one of the 2 based on what we have.Sharlotiger wrote:Is it just a case of Wil getting picked as we don't have any other fit forwards?gateman wrote:Big will keeps being put in the frame, but never gets to play, DP must see somthing in the lad but may be not enough for him to play strange one is that
Can't see him in RL too long, not a dig, just doesn't seem to have anything that makes a decent player for me.
More likely Sharlos thought process. Gadwin, Wardle, Cook, Foster all injured so Maher next in line.
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
i'd play webster, he scored 4 in the corresponding fixture last year. just kept running straight over the top of miller. this rain may slow the pitch down though.
jo brand is eddie warings love child
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 230
- Joined: 12 Aug 2014, 20:43
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
I thought Maher played quite well for Halifax v Widnes in there last game, agree though he should only be used when we have pretty bad injuries
Re: Squad for Wakey
Is David Fafita playing tomorrow I see he is still injured or is he to make a miracle recovery?
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23105
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
He’s injure, so won’t be playing.TT Tiger wrote:Is David Fafita playing tomorrow I see he is still injured or is he to make a miracle recovery?
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
chester claiming in an interview that he's only got 17 fit players. looks a strong squad though so apart from fifita and johnstone the other injured must be fringe players.
jo brand is eddie warings love child
Re: Squad for Wakey
Think Wakey have been pretty lucky on the injury front this year.lurcher wrote:chester claiming in an interview that he's only got 17 fit players. looks a strong squad though so apart from fifita and johnstone the other injured must be fringe players.
Re: Squad for Wakey
Had an OP and is back in Oz so no worry of him coming in at the last minute.....But it would be funny if he did.TT Tiger wrote:Is David Fafita playing tomorrow I see he is still injured or is he to make a miracle recovery?
Re: Squad for Wakey
Or are extremely fit and we have good physio's, depends on your agenda?WallTiger wrote:Think Wakey have been pretty lucky on the injury front this year.lurcher wrote:chester claiming in an interview that he's only got 17 fit players. looks a strong squad though so apart from fifita and johnstone the other injured must be fringe players.
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
just had a look jinj, it was a very small squad to start with. you only had 30 and then finn left. compare that with wigan and joe greenwood was wearing the number 40 shirt tonight
jo brand is eddie warings love child
Re: Squad for Wakey
Shhh don't say that, a lot on here think we should have a squad of world beatersLeeds tiger wrote:I thought Maher played quite well for Halifax v Widnes in there last game, agree though he should only be used when we have pretty bad injuries
-
- New member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 20 Sep 2018, 15:16
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
Imagine thinking about dropping James Clare when he has been head and shoulders above Eden all season. Why does Eden just kick ball when he is scared about getting tackled, useless under high ball. He is alright 10 meters out with an open space.
Re: Squad for Wakey
I watched the fax game and Maher was less than good never goes in a tackle first he just looks like he dont know what he is doing he is a nice lad but that dont make hin a good player why we still have hin beats meBigBez10 wrote:Shhh don't say that, a lot on here think we should have a squad of world beatersLeeds tiger wrote:I thought Maher played quite well for Halifax v Widnes in there last game, agree though he should only be used when we have pretty bad injuries
- Tigerade
- League One Player
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 13:18
- Location: Larging it in Lagentium
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
It's all bluff and bluster from Chester. When you look at their squad depth it's only the same as ours. Wakey have a reserve team as well as an Academy to fall back on as well. They have (and Jinger will correct me if I'm wrong) several players who have first team squad numbers but have hardly played this year like Hooley, Baldwinson, Kershaw, Wray and Ackroyd.lurcher wrote:chester claiming in an interview that he's only got 17 fit players. looks a strong squad though so apart from fifita and johnstone the other injured must be fringe players.
- mart0042
- Championship Player
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
- Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
- Contact:
Re: Squad for Wakey
Injuries are partly down to luck. Seen a lot of acl injuries recently and they are innocuous. Oggys looked worse and it's a 2 Weeker.
Fitness plays some part as does muscle mass. But mainly its down to luck.
Fitness plays some part as does muscle mass. But mainly its down to luck.
Re: Squad for Wakey
Yeah I'd go with that. I think the reason CC has made a thing about numbers is that the players missing are all regular first teamers, Fifita, England, Johnstone and Hurst all make a difference to Trinity. Maybe just maybe we shouldn't have let Mason Caton Brown leave, he'd have slotted straight in for JohnstoneTigerade wrote:It's all bluff and bluster from Chester. When you look at their squad depth it's only the same as ours. Wakey have a reserve team as well as an Academy to fall back on as well. They have (and Jinger will correct me if I'm wrong) several players who have first team squad numbers but have hardly played this year like Hooley, Baldwinson, Kershaw, Wray and Ackroyd.lurcher wrote:chester claiming in an interview that he's only got 17 fit players. looks a strong squad though so apart from fifita and johnstone the other injured must be fringe players.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: BradfordTiger and 70 guests