Next.....Salford

All things related to the Castleford Tigers.
Brummietiger
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 326
Joined: 14 Dec 2018, 07:16
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by Brummietiger » 17 Mar 2019, 22:16

old cas lass wrote:
tigerfeat wrote:Just hope mcshane gets sin bining enough and not a suspension coudnt see what had happened or if it was a punch he threw

What I saw it was more of a push than a punch.
Hope sin binning is sufficient but you can never tell with the disciplinary panel.
Can only go on the BBC Radio Leeds commentary, but they suggested it was more of a 'Cuffing' than an actual punch. :pray:

betts21
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 2757
Joined: 20 Jul 2006, 17:13
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by betts21 » 17 Mar 2019, 22:18

Push in face flat of hand sin bin sufficient to me who part of that was a joke I'm not sure how we got pen for holding down when players were all standing and having an argument before macca gave his slap and no whistle was blown or owt till then

User avatar
the machine
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 10135
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:21
Twitter: @dphartshorne
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by the machine » 17 Mar 2019, 23:35

Casmoley wrote:Powell put two of our best defenders Oggy and Foster down the right and we still concede very soft tries down that side. It's last year's full back issue all over again.
Tbf Oggy struggled when he was put on the right side last year
"I can accept failure. Everyone fails at something, but I cannot accept not trying"

Michael Jordan

Spanishtiger
Verified
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 885
Joined: 21 Dec 2016, 20:09
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by Spanishtiger » 17 Mar 2019, 23:41

casjunction wrote:On way to pick up the Father in Law the man who introduced me to Rugby league and Cas hospitality package to celebrate his 90 th Birthday.
Happy belated Birthday Classy Carrie.
And as you still like to shout Gerrintoem.
Only time he does not speak Queens English.
COYF
Would that be Clarrie that had the Smawthorne back in the day?

casjunction
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1883
Joined: 22 Jun 2012, 16:48
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by casjunction » 17 Mar 2019, 23:55

No Spanish.

gateman
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6693
Joined: 31 Mar 2016, 12:40
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by gateman » 18 Mar 2019, 00:40

Salford are a very well drilled side two very good half backs and forwards that do the hard yards I said to my son going down Weldon road injury free if the price is right I might back them for the challenge cup, I was very satisfied to come away with the two points

Casmoley
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1615
Joined: 10 Apr 2016, 23:01
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by Casmoley » 18 Mar 2019, 07:53

betts21 wrote:Push in face flat of hand sin bin sufficient to me who part of that was a joke I'm not sure how we got pen for holding down when players were all standing and having an argument before macca gave his slap and no whistle was blown or owt till then

looked like Walker had kicked out at Pete. All officials had missed it which is why it was all put on report and Macca took exception.

gateman
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6693
Joined: 31 Mar 2016, 12:40
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by gateman » 18 Mar 2019, 08:49

a lots been mentioned about soft try's out wide, what about when their number 14 who went from acting half back from 15 yards out putting the ball down under the posts not a finger laid on him Minikin know were near, watching the hand bagging after one of our players was kicked I don't think a punch was thrown

fords
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3901
Joined: 18 May 2007, 08:40
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by fords » 18 Mar 2019, 09:21

gateman wrote:a lots been mentioned about soft try's out wide, what about when their number 14 who went from acting half back from 15 yards out putting the ball down under the posts not a finger laid on him Minikin know were near, watching the hand bagging after one of our players was kicked I don't think a punch was thrown
Think all there tries were soft tbh. DP wont be happy with the tries we conceded i wouldn't think.

However we won, were 5 from 6, so cant complain too much.

Could be far worse like Leeds and Wigan. Playing poor and loosing.

heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3595
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by heritage1926 » 18 Mar 2019, 10:38

Poor game over all. Atmosphere included. Salford were by no means good, we were just really poor.

Absolutely dumfounded by (and for me this was the game changer), when Adam Walker kicked out at Peanut on the floor, McShane rightly reacted to it, yet was sin binned, Walker put on report (so obviously someone acknowledges he did something) and then we get the penalty! I felt that totally turned the game right before half time!

Must say however, Massey had a massive game, so much so that I was screaming for him to come back on when Salford were making there come back.

Foster probably his worst game in a Cas shirt, but I can forgive that.

duke street 10
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1827
Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 15:22
Location: glasshoughton,our new home?

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by duke street 10 » 18 Mar 2019, 13:05

I was impressed with Salford yesterday, the spine of that side is good and they will cause other teams lots of problems.

Hit & miss performance by us but a ugly win counts on the League table!

Fumper27
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 13513
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 08:10
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by Fumper27 » 18 Mar 2019, 13:44

heritage1926 wrote:when Adam Walker kicked out at Peanut on the floor, McShane rightly reacted to it, yet was sin binned, Walker put on report (so obviously someone acknowledges he did something).
That’s not entirely accurate. An incident can be put on report if the referee isn’t sure how an altercation started, so that the Match Review Panel can watch it back and apply sanctions if necessary.

heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3595
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by heritage1926 » 18 Mar 2019, 13:51

Fumper27 wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:when Adam Walker kicked out at Peanut on the floor, McShane rightly reacted to it, yet was sin binned, Walker put on report (so obviously someone acknowledges he did something).
That’s not entirely accurate. An incident can be put on report if the referee isn’t sure how an altercation started, so that the Match Review Panel can watch it back and apply sanctions if necessary.
In that case then, Salford should of had the penalty for McShane reacting - if Hicks and his goonies didn't know how the altercation started, yet sin binned McShane and gave us the penalty - then that implies they knew Walker had done something to be penalised over and cause our player to react!

User avatar
mart0042
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6355
Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by mart0042 » 18 Mar 2019, 14:07

the machine wrote:
Casmoley wrote:Powell put two of our best defenders Oggy and Foster down the right and we still concede very soft tries down that side. It's last year's full back issue all over again.
Tbf Oggy struggled when he was put on the right side last year
He always does, he is a specialist left second row. Wardle the same. Meeks is a right man. Go with strengths not make do.

Fumper27
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 13513
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 08:10
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by Fumper27 » 18 Mar 2019, 14:08

heritage1926 wrote:
Fumper27 wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:when Adam Walker kicked out at Peanut on the floor, McShane rightly reacted to it, yet was sin binned, Walker put on report (so obviously someone acknowledges he did something).
That’s not entirely accurate. An incident can be put on report if the referee isn’t sure how an altercation started, so that the Match Review Panel can watch it back and apply sanctions if necessary.
In that case then, Salford should of had the penalty for McShane reacting - if Hicks and his goonies didn't know how the altercation started, yet sin binned McShane and gave us the penalty - then that implies they knew Walker had done something to be penalised over and cause our player to react!
Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call

User avatar
Flat Capper
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 15173
Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 00:10
Location: Where ever I lay my fat
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by Flat Capper » 18 Mar 2019, 18:23

Fumper27 wrote: Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call
But the ref can reverse the penalty for a reaction to the original offence, seen it done many times.
Image
Spreading the Cas gene pool

cogito ergo sum
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1676
Joined: 20 Jun 2016, 08:47
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by cogito ergo sum » 18 Mar 2019, 22:19

Flat Capper wrote:
Fumper27 wrote: Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call
But the ref can reverse the penalty for a reaction to the original offence, seen it done many times.
I've seen a penalty reversed in RU but can't recall one in RL. Certainly nothing in the laws about penalty reversals. Many times you see players reacting, sometimes mass brawls, but the penalty still goes for the first offence.

baldtiger
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 432
Joined: 08 Mar 2014, 21:31
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by baldtiger » 18 Mar 2019, 22:30

duke street 10 wrote:I was impressed with Salford yesterday, the spine of that side is good and they will cause other teams lots of problems.

Hit & miss performance by us but a ugly win counts on the League table!
Just what i felt , but you put better , a ground out win n 2 points . that will do for now ..

sparky49
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 286
Joined: 04 Jan 2013, 12:19
Location: Castleford
Contact:

Re: Next.....Salford

Post by sparky49 » 19 Mar 2019, 00:46

cogito ergo sum wrote:
Flat Capper wrote:
Fumper27 wrote: Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call
But the ref can reverse the penalty for a reaction to the original offence, seen it done many times.
I've seen a penalty reversed in RU but can't recall one in RL. Certainly nothing in the laws about penalty reversals. Many times you see players reacting, sometimes mass brawls, but the penalty still goes for the first offence.

The penalty decision can be reversed on the intervention of a touch judge and i have seen this done many times, as will a lot of the older supporters. Now the same should apply on the intervention of the video ref for foul play.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 43s flyer, Adsense [Bot], mdean and 72 guests