Won't this be proved at least in part by the e mail received by Steve Gill from Mr Diamond - whilst it won't prove that they twisted his arm it does prove that whilst under contract to ourselves he has been approached by Sale and most likely instigated by the agent himself.It will be difficult to prove Sale induced him to breach his contract (unless Solomona decides to turn against them, which is unlikely given they are paying his wages).
All Solomona talk here.
Re: All Solomona talk here.
Re: All Solomona talk here.
The fact that Sale offered him a contract for more money knowing that he was under contract to Castleford for the same time period is probably proof of inducement, as established in Lumley v Gye 1853, a precedent that established a fundemental principle in the law of economic tort.
To save anyone looking it up the facts of the case are that Lumley engaged a singer on a three month contract to appear exclusively at his theatre. Gye then engaged the same singer to appear at an alternative theatre for the same period on the promise of more money. The singer cancelled the contract with Lumley and sang for Gye instead. Lumley sued for inducement of breach of contract and won. This case lays down the principle for actions in this area.
Substitute rugby player for singer and you have Sale (Gye) and Castleford (Lumley). That is our case in a nutshell it then becomes a matter of the amount of damages the court award which is where we need to establish our losses clearly and the confirmation of the offers received for Solomona become important in establishing these and getting the right amount of damages.
To save anyone looking it up the facts of the case are that Lumley engaged a singer on a three month contract to appear exclusively at his theatre. Gye then engaged the same singer to appear at an alternative theatre for the same period on the promise of more money. The singer cancelled the contract with Lumley and sang for Gye instead. Lumley sued for inducement of breach of contract and won. This case lays down the principle for actions in this area.
Substitute rugby player for singer and you have Sale (Gye) and Castleford (Lumley). That is our case in a nutshell it then becomes a matter of the amount of damages the court award which is where we need to establish our losses clearly and the confirmation of the offers received for Solomona become important in establishing these and getting the right amount of damages.
Re: All Solomona talk here.
Here's hoping Warrington and Wigan made offers over 250k, and indeed Sale at some point.Tiger53 wrote:The fact that Sale offered him a contract for more money knowing that he was under contract to Castleford for the same time period is probably proof of inducement, as established in Lumley v Gye 1853, a precedent that established a fundemental principle in the law of economic tort.
To save anyone looking it up the facts of the case are that Lumley engaged a singer on a three month contract to appear exclusively at his theatre. Gye then engaged the same singer to appear at an alternative theatre for the same period on the promise of more money. The singer cancelled the contract with Lumley and sang for Gye instead. Lumley sued for inducement of breach of contract and won. This case lays down the principle for actions in this area.
Substitute rugby player for singer and you have Sale (Gye) and Castleford (Lumley). That is our case in a nutshell it then becomes a matter of the amount of damages the court award which is where we need to establish our losses clearly and the confirmation of the offers received for Solomona become important in establishing these and getting the right amount of damages.
Thanks for the very informative post.
Audacter Et Sincere
Re: All Solomona talk here.
my only worry is that in the case above the singer hasnt swapped trades whilst solamona claims he has?Mysterio wrote:Tiger53 wrote:The fact that Sale offered him a contract for more money knowing that he was under contract to Castleford for the same time period is probably proof of inducement, as established in Lumley v Gye 1853, a precedent that established a fundemental principle in the law of economic tort.
To save anyone looking it up the facts of the case are that Lumley engaged a singer on a three month contract to appear exclusively at his theatre. Gye then engaged the same singer to appear at an alternative theatre for the same period on the promise of more money. The singer cancelled the contract with Lumley and sang for Gye instead. Lumley sued for inducement of breach of contract and won. This case lays down the principle for actions in this area.
Substitute rugby player for singer and you have Sale (Gye) and Castleford (Lumley). That is our case in a nutshell it then becomes a matter of the amount of damages the court award which is where we need to establish our losses clearly and the confirmation of the offers received for Solomona become important in establishing these and getting the right amount of damages.
Re: All Solomona talk here.
I would have thought if the original concert has been Jazz Music and the better offer had been a musical instead, the original ruling would have taken place :hand:yorky wrote:my only worry is that in the case above the singer hasnt swapped trades whilst solamona claims he has?Mysterio wrote:Tiger53 wrote:The fact that Sale offered him a contract for more money knowing that he was under contract to Castleford for the same time period is probably proof of inducement, as established in Lumley v Gye 1853, a precedent that established a fundemental principle in the law of economic tort.
To save anyone looking it up the facts of the case are that Lumley engaged a singer on a three month contract to appear exclusively at his theatre. Gye then engaged the same singer to appear at an alternative theatre for the same period on the promise of more money. The singer cancelled the contract with Lumley and sang for Gye instead. Lumley sued for inducement of breach of contract and won. This case lays down the principle for actions in this area.
Substitute rugby player for singer and you have Sale (Gye) and Castleford (Lumley). That is our case in a nutshell it then becomes a matter of the amount of damages the court award which is where we need to establish our losses clearly and the confirmation of the offers received for Solomona become important in establishing these and getting the right amount of damages.
Audacter Et Sincere
Re: All Solomona talk here.
well we all live in hope that the courts go in our favour :pray:
- Max n paddy
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 20:53
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
Does anyone know when this is going to court ?
Ding Dang Doo, Let the tiger see the rhino !!
Re: All Solomona talk here.
i read on hear that its supposed to be in the high court on monday 8th May 2017Max n paddy wrote:Does anyone know when this is going to court ?
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1676
- Joined: 20 Jun 2016, 08:47
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
8 May quoted in Daily Express, part of a full page RU feature on his selection for England.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4033
- Joined: 12 Jun 2012, 22:26
- Location: NORMANTON-BUT CLOSER TO CAS THAN WAKEY BAD LANDS
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
cogito ergo sum wrote:8 May quoted in Daily Express, part of a full page RU feature on his selection for England.
there was also a a small part in one the sunday papers they also stated the 8th lets hope its sorted soon
- Flat Capper
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 00:10
- Location: Where ever I lay my fat
- Contact:
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
Doesn't look like it!!
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
This one neither!
Re: All Solomona talk here.
Getting closer
- Flat Capper
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 00:10
- Location: Where ever I lay my fat
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
Oh dear! Wish it was me...jackknife wrote:Few
Spreading the Cas gene pool
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4033
- Joined: 12 Jun 2012, 22:26
- Location: NORMANTON-BUT CLOSER TO CAS THAN WAKEY BAD LANDS
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
or could be mine
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4033
- Joined: 12 Jun 2012, 22:26
- Location: NORMANTON-BUT CLOSER TO CAS THAN WAKEY BAD LANDS
- Contact:
Re: All Solomona talk here.
so it was me who his the magic 150
Re: All Solomona talk here.
On a thread you were never going to comment on again.oh the ironyonetiger wrote:so it was me who his the magic 150
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests