Best pack up and leave if that's the best we can do.Mucky1978 wrote:Heard we are in for Grix 2 year deal
What if..
Re: What if..
- Tigerade
- League One Player
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 13:18
- Location: Larging it in Lagentium
- Contact:
Re: What if..
I don't think we are looking at Grix but I would be looking at at the young lad he is keeping out of the Wakey team - Max Jowett. Only next year to run on his contract.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 825
- Joined: 28 Mar 2014, 09:20
- Contact:
Re: What if..
What is doing the rounds, Benny fullback and we are to sign an halfback.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: 17 Sep 2016, 10:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
Is it possible we could sell Zak to a union team ?
I understand Ben Barba played Union during his ban from RL .
Not sure if rules differ over there but he was playing in France I think . Anyone know the rules feel free to enlighten me lol.
I understand Ben Barba played Union during his ban from RL .
Not sure if rules differ over there but he was playing in France I think . Anyone know the rules feel free to enlighten me lol.
Re: What if..
No he will be banned from basically every UK sport as I understand ittakethetwo wrote:Is it possible we could sell Zak to a union team ?
I understand Ben Barba played Union during his ban from RL .
Not sure if rules differ over there but he was playing in France I think . Anyone know the rules feel free to enlighten me lol.
Re: What if..
Be better if we could loan him to union until his ban is up then get him back
CLASSY CAS FOREVER
Re: What if..
It won't be a rugby league ban. Will essentially be all sportsjackknife wrote:Be better if we could loan him to union until his ban is up then get him back
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
No. As it was a UKAD test he will receive a worldwide ban from all sports that comply with WADA, which is just about every sport in every country.lidds wrote:No he will be banned from basically every UK sport as I understand ittakethetwo wrote:Is it possible we could sell Zak to a union team ?
I understand Ben Barba played Union during his ban from RL .
Not sure if rules differ over there but he was playing in France I think . Anyone know the rules feel free to enlighten me lol.
What is he like at MMA? They don’t comply with WADA.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4033
- Joined: 12 Jun 2012, 22:26
- Location: NORMANTON-BUT CLOSER TO CAS THAN WAKEY BAD LANDS
- Contact:
Re: What if..
this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: 17 Sep 2016, 10:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
Thanks for clearing that up guys.
Was Ben Barba only a RL ban because the offence occured out of competition or because of different doping agencies ?
Was Ben Barba only a RL ban because the offence occured out of competition or because of different doping agencies ?
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: 17 Sep 2016, 10:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
Hanbury is great going forward , but defensively is pretty poor.onetiger wrote:this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
We might not have much choice though tbf.
Surely there is a full back in our academy ?
Leeds have brought two through in 2 years.
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
The frustration here is that we offered Jack Walker a contract when he was considering leaving Leeds.takethetwo wrote:Hanbury is great going forward , but defensively is pretty poor.onetiger wrote:this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
We might not have much choice though tbf.
Surely there is a full back in our academy ?
Leeds have brought two through in 2 years.
If we had known we would lose Hardaker we would probably offered him a lot more and the chance for him to establish himself at full-back, which was his main reason for not signing the first contract Leeds offered him.
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
Both.takethetwo wrote:Thanks for clearing that up guys.
Was Ben Barba only a RL ban because the offence occured out of competition or because of different doping agencies ?
It was not conducted by a WADA drug testing agency.
It was out-of-competition,
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
Hanbury is non-fed trained. We already have the most we are allowed, so unless we release one of Roberts, JSL, Millington, HItchcox, Moors or Lo we won't be signing him.onetiger wrote:this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
Re: What if..
We can have seven.nottinghamtiger wrote:Hanbury is non-fed trained. We already have the most we are allowed, so unless we release one of Roberts, JSL, Millington, HItchcox, Moors or Lo we won't be signing him.onetiger wrote:this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: What if..
He doesn't count. I think it's because he's been here since before the rules came into force. Dorn was the sameHuddsTigers wrote:Webster?
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: What if..
Sorry - Mitch Clark.The Firm wrote:We can have seven.nottinghamtiger wrote:Hanbury is non-fed trained. We already have the most we are allowed, so unless we release one of Roberts, JSL, Millington, HItchcox, Moors or Lo we won't be signing him.onetiger wrote:this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
Edit - was this ever confirmed?
Re: What if..
Don’t think so yet hence i didn’t count him. If he is then thats job done.nottinghamtiger wrote:Sorry - Mitch Clark.The Firm wrote:We can have seven.nottinghamtiger wrote:Hanbury is non-fed trained. We already have the most we are allowed, so unless we release one of Roberts, JSL, Millington, HItchcox, Moors or Lo we won't be signing him.onetiger wrote:this is the guy who a number of people are talking about Rhys Hanbury
some saying we going to offer him 2 yrs deal ..but there again as a early poster put
scott grix from wakefield on a 2 yrs deal..
Edit - was this ever confirmed?
It opens a whole new argument about why we are using so many overseas slits of players that are not a first choice 17 pick.
- mart0042
- Championship Player
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
- Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
- Contact:
Re: What if..
We've lost Larroyer who is fed trained and monaghan who is in the quota. So can't we have one of each?
If lo is one, we should have space. Clark not announced so not so sure on him.
If lo is one, we should have space. Clark not announced so not so sure on him.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests