Wigan after Mitch Clark

Players in ... Players out. Got a rumour? Post it in here.
heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3612
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by heritage1926 » 13 May 2019, 13:20

tigerfeat wrote:Just looked on Wigan forum and somebody put Clark will be a direct replacement for Tautai who will be at cas next season
Can have my season ticket anall if we sign that big useless *$#@% ha ha
Nar can't see it. This was just a case of Mitch being off contract, Wigan offering him more money on a longer contract. Wigan fans probably hoping that's the case, as they're had enough of the likes of him and Navarette.

User avatar
mart0042
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6355
Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by mart0042 » 14 May 2019, 09:43

Balboa1 wrote:
mart0042 wrote:
Balboa1 wrote:Still stand by my opinion Clark has used the club as a stepping stone to greater things if true right choice? Who knows rugby is a short career but I just feel loyalty should come into it too and reward those that gave you a chance
Most players do that. It's a16 year career, gotta make the money in a short space of time.
Loyal was people like Joyner not do a year or so then move on can see some of your point needs to put food on the table but still would av liked him a bit longer same as wish hardaker and Clark were still ere too
He has flourished under our coaching. If he goes it'll be the money.

Tamworth Tiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 7400
Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by Tamworth Tiger » 14 May 2019, 11:47

Fairly sure there was a lot of interest in Joyner. Bradford comes to mind , but in those days clubs had more control and they weren’t interested in letting him go

Sharlotiger
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1812
Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 23:02
Location: WAKEFIELD
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by Sharlotiger » 14 May 2019, 12:26

Tamworth Tiger wrote:Fairly sure there was a lot of interest in Joyner. Bradford comes to mind , but in those days clubs had more control and they weren’t interested in letting him go
Joyner was on Hulls radar and had a spell on the sidelines trying to force Cas to let him go.

User avatar
lurcher
Verified
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 10676
Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
Location: bridlington
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by lurcher » 14 May 2019, 12:48

heritage1926 wrote:
tigerfeat wrote:Just looked on Wigan forum and somebody put Clark will be a direct replacement for Tautai who will be at cas next season
Can have my season ticket anall if we sign that big useless *$#@% ha ha
Nar can't see it. This was just a case of Mitch being off contract, Wigan offering him more money on a longer contract. Wigan fans probably hoping that's the case, as they're had enough of the likes of him and Navarette.
i'd say clark would be a direct replacement for hamlin who wigan have just lost to a drugs ban. almost identical impact off the bench. very direct style but only for short spells.
jo brand is eddie warings love child

HuddsTigers
Verified
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 15893
Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by HuddsTigers » 14 May 2019, 13:09

Have they even sacked Hamlin? Would be hypocritical of them after the comments when signing Hardaker.

Also wonder who is making the signings for next season for them given their coaching fiasco? Alright if Clark signs a deal with them only to find out the coach doesn't want him after all. Makes me wonder whether Lam has got the nudge and winks already that the position is his.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!

User avatar
old cas lass
Verified
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 23239
Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by old cas lass » 06 Jun 2019, 09:12

It’s official.
Wigan have announced it on there twitter page.
3 year deal.

User avatar
StevieTheTV
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 739
Joined: 12 Apr 2011, 15:52
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by StevieTheTV » 06 Jun 2019, 09:17

Good deal for Clark as I would hope Cas would of never given him a 3 year deal.

Good squad player - Yes
Irreplaceable - Definitely NOT.
Tigers for Life! Not just for SuperLeague!!

Tawera Nikau = Legend

User avatar
old cas lass
Verified
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 23239
Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by old cas lass » 06 Jun 2019, 09:30

StevieTheTV wrote:Good deal for Clark as I would hope Cas would of never given him a 3 year deal.

Good squad player - Yes
Irreplaceable - Definitely NOT.

Haven’t we just replaced him with griffin......if the stories are true.

heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3612
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by heritage1926 » 06 Jun 2019, 09:33

All the best to Mitch. Nothing but admiration for him, with how he turned his career around. Looked like it was over before it started when he was shipped out to Fev.

However, if I was Cas, I would be looking to do a deal where he goes to Wigan now and not the end of the year. I’ve got a massive problem with players who sign deals with other clubs half way through a season, posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.

nottinghamtiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 5272
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by nottinghamtiger » 06 Jun 2019, 09:35

If we can use his non-fed quota spot on a top player who will improve our starting 17 (preferably a winger) then this might turn out to be in our best interests.
Given the circumstances that led to us signing him, I imagine he’s been on a pretty low contract during his time at the club and therefore he’s given very good value for money. If he can earn more at Wigan over a longer period of time, he’s done the right thing for himself by moving,

User avatar
mart0042
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6355
Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by mart0042 » 06 Jun 2019, 09:40

nottinghamtiger wrote:If we can use his non-fed quota spot on a top player who will improve our starting 17 (preferably a winger) then this might turn out to be in our best interests.
Given the circumstances that led to us signing him, I imagine he’s been on a pretty low contract during his time at the club and therefore he’s given very good value for money. If he can earn more at Wigan over a longer period of time, he’s done the right thing for himself by moving,
Lots of players up for grabs in the nrl, this gives us at least one option. Any back better would be fine.

nottinghamtiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 5272
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by nottinghamtiger » 06 Jun 2019, 09:41

heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.

heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3612
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by heritage1926 » 06 Jun 2019, 09:46

nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.
It's on Wigans social media mate.

User avatar
old cas lass
Verified
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 23239
Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by old cas lass » 06 Jun 2019, 09:48

nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.

There’s a photo of him on the DW pitch with him holding a Wigan scarf.
He said something like, Wigan is a massive club and I can’t wait to get stuck in.

I think he means, Wigan have a big stadium with a massive history.
But at the minute they are pants :D

nottinghamtiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 5272
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by nottinghamtiger » 06 Jun 2019, 09:51

heritage1926 wrote:
nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.
It's on Wigans social media mate.
Hmmmm. The article I read just had him wearing a black hoody stood in a stand at the DW.
I raised eyebrows at his comments about how much he’s looking forward to next season, but I think we have to remember that players are in a bit of a difficult position with this one. He’s not said “I can’t wait to leave Cas” - he needs to put a positive spin on things for his new club. He can’t very well come out with “well, Wigan offered me the most money over the most number of years so I signed for them”, even though that’s usually the truth of the matter almost every time a player signs a contract.

heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3612
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by heritage1926 » 06 Jun 2019, 10:08

nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:
nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.
It's on Wigans social media mate.
Hmmmm. The article I read just had him wearing a black hoody stood in a stand at the DW.
I raised eyebrows at his comments about how much he’s looking forward to next season, but I think we have to remember that players are in a bit of a difficult position with this one. He’s not said “I can’t wait to leave Cas” - he needs to put a positive spin on things for his new club. He can’t very well come out with “well, Wigan offered me the most money over the most number of years so I signed for them”, even though that’s usually the truth of the matter almost every time a player signs a contract.
The most sensible and logical thing would be to not do these kind of things in the first place. Put's both player and the club in a predicament with the fans.

nottinghamtiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 5272
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by nottinghamtiger » 06 Jun 2019, 10:16

heritage1926 wrote:
nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:
nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.
It's on Wigans social media mate.
Hmmmm. The article I read just had him wearing a black hoody stood in a stand at the DW.
I raised eyebrows at his comments about how much he’s looking forward to next season, but I think we have to remember that players are in a bit of a difficult position with this one. He’s not said “I can’t wait to leave Cas” - he needs to put a positive spin on things for his new club. He can’t very well come out with “well, Wigan offered me the most money over the most number of years so I signed for them”, even though that’s usually the truth of the matter almost every time a player signs a contract.
The most sensible and logical thing would be to not do these kind of things in the first place. Put's both player and the club in a predicament with the fans.
Trouble is, all that leads to is rumour and speculation, that can be equally as unhelpful. Everyone knows when a player’s contract is due to expire and if they don’t sign a new deal, it’s obvious they are moving elsewhere. These days, the RFL even publish a list of players who haven’t signed anywhere and those who have, so it’s obvious who is moving on.

tigerfeat
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 14630
Joined: 23 Jun 2014, 12:07
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by tigerfeat » 06 Jun 2019, 10:27

old cas lass wrote:
nottinghamtiger wrote:
heritage1926 wrote:?..posing in their new teams colours. Seeing Mitch in a Wigan shirt and holding a scarf, saying how much he’s looking forward to getting stuck in with them next season, doesn’t sit well with me. The same applies for any player doing the same. Not a fan of it.
Has this actually happened? I have very similar views to be honest and think it’s a bit disrespectful to a player’s current club. I didn’t like it when Rangi did the same when he moved to Salford and I thought it was a bit odd for Adam Swift to do the same last week when his move to Hull was announced.
Generally I have no problems with players signing elsewhere for the following season and continuing to play for their current club. But the player needs to be mindful that he’s employed by his current club and not give the impression he’s just biding his time until he moves.

There’s a photo of him on the DW pitch with him holding a Wigan scarf.
He said something like, Wigan is a massive club and I can’t wait to get stuck in.

I think he means, Wigan have a big stadium with a massive history.
But at the minute they are pants :D
Wigan fans are more angry with the comings and goings than us theve made some weird signings not saying Clark is a poor signing think he will do well
Theve lost top players tho and not replaced them like for like don't matter who you are bad times will follow same at Leeds
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi

heritage1926
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3612
Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
Contact:

Re: Wigan after Mitch Clark

Post by heritage1926 » 06 Jun 2019, 11:00

I believe Wigan have offered him 20k more a year, that’s 60k over the 3 years. That’s financially enticing for anyone. However, is he worth an extra 20k a year when he can’t do big minutes? I’d much rather give Wattsy an extra 20k a year and keep him in Cas colours (if the rumours of NRL clubs watching him are true). He's much more value for money.

I can see why Wigan fans would be questioning the signing. We'd be going crazy too if we offered a contract to an over seas player who's had minimal starting time. Can teams these days really afford to have quota spots sat on the bench?! Maybe Wigan can develop him in to a prop who plays more minutes, but then they won't get the most out of him.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests