Wakefield
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
If Toronto do get in SL, there is a belief that they don’t get a portion of Sky money.
In which case the question is whether all the clubs get their share of £1.65m (£150,000 each).
New York have already got a TV deal lined up by all accounts.
And Toronto already have a tv deal over there. Whether it can generate financial income I don’t know but if it does, then we have a decision to make on whether we pool broadcasting deals together and split the money.
If it’s under what Sky give current clubs then the others will be fine for that to happen but as soon as it gets above £1.65m, clubs will probably kick up a stink.
In which case the question is whether all the clubs get their share of £1.65m (£150,000 each).
New York have already got a TV deal lined up by all accounts.
And Toronto already have a tv deal over there. Whether it can generate financial income I don’t know but if it does, then we have a decision to make on whether we pool broadcasting deals together and split the money.
If it’s under what Sky give current clubs then the others will be fine for that to happen but as soon as it gets above £1.65m, clubs will probably kick up a stink.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
Re: Wakefield
Old wives tale. If Toronto make it to superleague they will be eligible to the same tv payments as every other team. Their payment to clubs to fund travel etc also ends. There is no guaranteed deal from the Canadian side at this point either and if it comes about it won’t worth be a fortune anyway.HuddsTigers wrote:If Toronto do get in SL, there is a belief that they don’t get a portion of Sky money.
In which case the question is whether all the clubs get their share of £1.65m (£150,000 each).
New York have already got a TV deal lined up by all accounts.
And Toronto already have a tv deal over there. Whether it can generate financial income I don’t know but if it does, then we have a decision to make on whether we pool broadcasting deals together and split the money.
If it’s under what Sky give current clubs then the others will be fine for that to happen but as soon as it gets above £1.65m, clubs will probably kick up a stink.
- mart0042
- Championship Player
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
- Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
If Sonny bill has signed for Toronto next year, you just watch the crowd at Cas grow for that!
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012, 16:48
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
This Wakefield thread began on all things tigers now it has morphed into a Toronto thread.
The cost of the away fixture will cost clubs tens of thousands and if you played them twice.
February the temperature can be a bit colder than Odsal Top.
Expansion yes but look at the cost implications.
The logistics and cost make no economic sense.
But Redhall and common sense are not even on nodding terms.
The cost of the away fixture will cost clubs tens of thousands and if you played them twice.
February the temperature can be a bit colder than Odsal Top.
Expansion yes but look at the cost implications.
The logistics and cost make no economic sense.
But Redhall and common sense are not even on nodding terms.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1827
- Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 15:22
- Location: glasshoughton,our new home?
Re: Wakefield
I think as the fixture list has fallen Sky would love another Million pound match up (Wakefield v London last game).
Despite their form i reckon Wakefield will find another win from somewhere,probably after Carter shows Chester the door.
Despite their form i reckon Wakefield will find another win from somewhere,probably after Carter shows Chester the door.
Re: Wakefield
We desperately need a win from somewhere and I really can't see where it's coming from. One win would probably be enough, I'd guess we'll be Targetting Hull and Wigan at home, Hull can be hit and miss and Wigan tonked us but are a very average team. Nervous times for us. I keep saying to myself, "it's only a game, it will be a laugh doing the Championship" but that's complete ball peckers.
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
wonder what was said at half time on thursday. certainly looked a different team in the 2nd half. saints haven't done you any favours today with their team selection versus london.
jo brand is eddie warings love child
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1827
- Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 15:22
- Location: glasshoughton,our new home?
Re: Wakefield
In my opinion saints have earned that team selection with their season so far,and the pre season that proceeded that (clearly they are fitter than the rest). Isn't their fault most of the league is sub standard in 2019.lurcher wrote:wonder what was said at half time on thursday. certainly looked a different team in the 2nd half. saints haven't done you any favours today with their team selection versus london.
Anyway its Nice to be top of the West Yorkshire pile at the moment...lets enjoy it
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
i thought halifax next week would have been the best option for resting players rather than london.
jo brand is eddie warings love child
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1827
- Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 15:22
- Location: glasshoughton,our new home?
Re: Wakefield
Can't afford to take the risk of that backfiring on them,plus Saints haven't been to Wembley in over 10 years. for club of their stature that pretty remarkable.lurcher wrote:i thought halifax next week would have been the best option for resting players rather than london.
- mart0042
- Championship Player
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
- Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
There is no cost financially as its paid by Toronto maybe even out of there sky money. The cost is the travelling to the players and their recovery.casjunction wrote:This Wakefield thread began on all things tigers now it has morphed into a Toronto thread.
The cost of the away fixture will cost clubs tens of thousands and if you played them twice.
February the temperature can be a bit colder than Odsal Top.
Expansion yes but look at the cost implications.
The logistics and cost make no economic sense.
But Redhall and common sense are not even on nodding terms.
- StevieTheTV
- Academy Player
- Posts: 739
- Joined: 12 Apr 2011, 15:52
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
If / when Toronto do get into SL, the clubs have to pay for their travel and accommodation.mart0042 wrote:There is no cost financially as its paid by Toronto maybe even out of there sky money. The cost is the travelling to the players and their recovery.casjunction wrote:This Wakefield thread began on all things tigers now it has morphed into a Toronto thread.
The cost of the away fixture will cost clubs tens of thousands and if you played them twice.
February the temperature can be a bit colder than Odsal Top.
Expansion yes but look at the cost implications.
The logistics and cost make no economic sense.
But Redhall and common sense are not even on nodding terms.
Toronto only agree'd to pay for the travel and accommodation in the lower leagues.
Tigers for Life! Not just for SuperLeague!!
Tawera Nikau = Legend
Tawera Nikau = Legend
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012, 16:48
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
Thanks Stevie the TV l thought that was the case.
So as l said it makes no commercial sense.
A severe injury requiring hospitalisation would be a nightmare.
When you factor in the away support you have another fixture where revenue is affected.
I know some argue that clubs should not rely on away fans but it is a welcome funding stream.
So as l said it makes no commercial sense.
A severe injury requiring hospitalisation would be a nightmare.
When you factor in the away support you have another fixture where revenue is affected.
I know some argue that clubs should not rely on away fans but it is a welcome funding stream.
- mart0042
- Championship Player
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
- Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
I'm surprised at that, they must either be getting Torontos sky money or something else. The flight costs alone must be 15k.probably 30 players and staff at a discount of £500 each.StevieTheTV wrote:If / when Toronto do get into SL, the clubs have to pay for their travel and accommodation.mart0042 wrote:There is no cost financially as its paid by Toronto maybe even out of there sky money. The cost is the travelling to the players and their recovery.casjunction wrote:This Wakefield thread began on all things tigers now it has morphed into a Toronto thread.
The cost of the away fixture will cost clubs tens of thousands and if you played them twice.
February the temperature can be a bit colder than Odsal Top.
Expansion yes but look at the cost implications.
The logistics and cost make no economic sense.
But Redhall and common sense are not even on nodding terms.
Toronto only agree'd to pay for the travel and accommodation in the lower leagues.
What will happen to the loop fixtures? And surely monetarily and travel wise hurts the 3 teams that have to make the trip. I can't see them voting them in unless there's more money.
Re: Wakefield
I looked on the wakey forum last night and Carter's on discussing Rocky Hampshires contract surely something would tell him that's not the smartest thing to be doing
As someone said on there he's thrown him under the bus on the supporters forum without him having any chance to reply
As someone said on there he's thrown him under the bus on the supporters forum without him having any chance to reply
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Wakefield
They guy who said it is his dad, I'm sure gateman knows him.tigerfeat wrote:I looked on the wakey forum last night and Carter's on discussing Rocky Hampshires contract surely something would tell him that's not the smartest thing to be doing
As someone said on there he's thrown him under the bus on the supporters forum without him having any chance to reply
Re: Wakefield
his he i can understand then
its fine when the teams doing well to have a laugh with the fans on the forum things change when trouble is on the horizen but thats up to him done a great job for trinity as ive said many times
its fine when the teams doing well to have a laugh with the fans on the forum things change when trouble is on the horizen but thats up to him done a great job for trinity as ive said many times
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield
I can kind of understand Carter having an account on RLfans, suppose it's a good way of keeping up to date with how the fan base are feeling, however, for him to be interacting with fans like he is on that thread is madness.JIN JER wrote:They guy who said it is his dad, I'm sure gateman knows him.tigerfeat wrote:I looked on the wakey forum last night and Carter's on discussing Rocky Hampshires contract surely something would tell him that's not the smartest thing to be doing
As someone said on there he's thrown him under the bus on the supporters forum without him having any chance to reply
However, reading between the lines, it looks like the agent is the one creating the issue, said agent for Hampshire is seems to be non other than SMTMUK.
Re: Wakefield
it would be rockys dream job playing at trinity and it looks like reading there forum last night hes been low balled with a offer of a new contract and thought sod that il look elsewhere which as happened at other clubs recently !!
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Wakefield
It'll be a pity if he leaves, his heart is genuinely at Belle vue, he came to Perpignan with us as a specci about ten years since.tigerfeat wrote:it would be rockys dream job playing at trinity and it looks like reading there forum last night hes been low balled with a offer of a new contract and thought sod that il look elsewhere which as happened at other clubs recently !!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests